In 1808 the United States made slave trading illegal, forbidding its citizens to partake in the international slave trade. Plantation owners in America continued to see slavery as an economic necessity ("Africa, empires and," 2002). They were able to make more money selling slaves than using them on the sugar plantations as the consumption of sugar dropped.
Many of the states were divided in to pro-and anti-slavery states. There was a debate in Congress as to how to divide the newly acquired territories into slave and free states. The Compromise of 1820 was an agreement between both factions regulating slavery in the western territories. Under this compromise slavery was prohibited in the new states north of the border of Arkansas territory, excluding Missouri. Constitutionally the 1820 compromise had no right to impose on a state seeking admission to the Union conditions that did not apply to those states already in the Union ("1800s-1850s: expansion of," 2008).
In 1850 another Compromise was made. California was a free state and New Mexico and Utah territories would decide whether they would be a free or slave when applying for statehood. At this time the Fugitive Slave Act was also passed. The federal government was responsible for apprehending fugitive slaves in the North and sending them back to the South ("1800s-1850s: expansion of," 2008).
Dred Scott was born into slavery and when he was older was sold to a military surgeon. He traveled around the country with the surgeon, mostly in free states. Mr. Scott and his family were similar in that they both had families. When Mr. Scott’s owner died he sued his owner’s widow for his freedom. His case eventually made it before the Supreme Court.
On March 6th, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the majority opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. Seven of the nine justices agreed that Dred Scott should remain a slave, but Taney did not stop there. He also ruled that as a slave, Dred Scott was not a citizen of the United States, and therefore had no right to bring suit Chief Justice Roger B. Taney in the federal courts on any matter. In addition, he declared that Scott had never been free, due to the fact that slaves were personal property; thus the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional, and the Federal Government had no right to prohibit slavery in the new territories. The court appeared to be sanctioning slavery under the terms of the Constitution itself, and saying that slavery could not be outlawed or restricted within the United States. The American public reacted very strongly to the Dred Scott Decision. Antislavery groups feared that slavery would spread unchecked. The new Republican Party, founded in 1854 to prohibit the spread of slavery, renewed their fight to gain control of the Congress and the courts. Their well-planned political campaign of 1860, coupled with divisive issues which split the Democratic Party, led to the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States and South Carolina's secession from the Union. The Dred Scott Decision moved the country to the brink of Civil War ("The Dred Scott,"). (Jennifer S.)
Despite leading to debates and conflicts, slave trading and slave labor was essential to plantation owners because it made their lifestyle possible. (Next section: Life in the Manor)